Sunday, April 21, 2013

and that's a wrap!


For a final reflection, we are invited to look back and consider where this semester has taken us, and what it has given us as newcomers entering the LIS profession.  And as I look back on the topics we’ve covered and the work I have done, I can say with great confidence that I am glad to have begun finding my way, on this vocational journey!  There are fringe benefits for a naturally curious person like me, to be sure, in a profession that is significantly focused on learning.  But the fringe benefits are far outweighed by the great contributions that the library profession has to offer!

This class has intentionally focused on the LIS profession, and I am grateful to have had this opportunity to think early on about what it means to be a library professional. I have always sought to focus my vocational energies with a strong sense of professionalism, wherever I am – whether that has meant engaging my work and those around me with professional behavior, or standing (and learning and growing and changing) in solidarity with colleagues who share a similar professional identity and imagination.

Towards that end, as a budding LIS professional, I’ve discovered that I bring a strong desire to connect across library settings and specialties, even as I currently maintain a strong personal interest in public librarianship.  That is to say, as I continue my studies and enter into this field, I will not only continue to read and learn across specialties and disciplines, but I will actively seek to help different types of libraries build bridges that will benefit the profession at large, as they also benefit the public good.  Public libraries, school libraries, academic libraries, special libraries – all contribute significantly to the specific communities they serve.  How much more so can libraries contribute if we are able to find better ways to practice librarianship together – creating programs and services that cut across our institutional boundaries, towards greater access to information and individual and communal development?   I know, I know – budgets, time limitations, daily (weekly, monthly) work stresses, etc.  But where such collaboration is possible, it must be brought to fruition (even if it sometimes fails) – and I will bring a serious passion for such collective possibilities to any library where I am privileged to serve.

In my recent journaling about professional journals, I’ve also learned about “progressive librarianship,” and I will count that discovery as one of the more significant things I have encountered thus far.  That is to say, I’ve come to understand that the core values and ethics of professional librarians are indeed progressive values – values that focus on our social responsibility towards every human being’s potential, and therefore toward the public good.  And so, as I began this semester I also now conclude with a key assumption that can be boiled down to this: all the work that we do – the advancements toward new and ever-changing information technologies, the development of information collections, the various methods of organization and retrieval, the ethical considerations, the reference and reader’s advisory expertise, all of it – it’s about the people we are here to serve, and the society to which we offer essential contributions.  The LIS profession is about connecting people with the information that they are seeking (and perhaps even information that they didn’t yet know they were seeking), in order to enhance their lives in ways that are meaningful to them – and, ultimately, in ways that will enhance the communities and society we inhabit together.

I am excited about all that is to come, as I continue on my LIS journey – and I am proud to be connected to a professional community that is so deeply committed to public service, social responsibility and possibility, through the lenses of equal access to information, intellectual freedom and life-long learning.

let’s just assume…


As a penultimate journal entry, we’ve been invited to revisit our opening posts, to take another look at our assumptions and beliefs as we began this semester’s explorations of the LIS profession, and to see if there are ways that these assertions have changed, evolved, or stayed the course.  I offer a snapshot of each assumption below, along with a bit of commentary, regarding where I am now, after getting my feet wet in the LIS pool.

#1:  Rapid changes in technology have made for a very different LIS landscape than just a few years ago – yet even with such significant changes, the foundational tasks of librarianship still remain the same.  As we round out this semester of introduction to the profession, I am pleased to note that this assumption still holds water.  I myself have held firm throughout, with a solid stance in the foundational people-focused areas of librarianship – especially service, intellectual freedom, equal access and social responsibility.  This stance has been buttressed by our learning about such essential professional components as the ALA’s core values and code of ethics for professional librarianship, and as some of my posts below will attest, there are so many ways in which librarians across the spectrum are sharply focused on how best to provide excellent library service – on behalf of the people they serve and the possibilities that are before each individual, each community, and our very society – as the information terrain continues to morph into the future.

#2:  LIS professionals embrace change and innovation a bit more quickly and positively than members of other professions, harnessing the power of new technologies in light of our shared mission to make resources readily and easily available to the people who desire and need them.  I’m going to say that I’ve had to take a wee step back from this assumption…  Not because I’ve encountered LIS professionals who are generally wary of new technologies, but because it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons of new technologies, towards living out our libraries’ missions on behalf of the people we serve.  Our team blog assignment on patron-driven acquisitions offers a good example.  The jury’s still out on PDA, as a collection development method that benefits libraries and patrons alike; there appear to be plenty of academic librarians who have embraced PDA, as well as plenty who yet remain unconvinced that this is a responsible way to grow a library’s offerings.  Social media tools provide another good example.  Rather than jumping on the bandwagon, libraries do well to think reflectively about whether such networking and marketing opportunities will enhance their mission, or instead distract from the work that is at the core of librarianship.  With all of that said, I’ll tweak this assumption, to say that LIS professionals embrace change and innovation, with a healthy amount of professional skepticism (a “hermeneutic of suspicion,” some might say in other circles), and with an eye toward what is professionally responsible.

#3:  Wherever I (or any other LIS professional, for that matter) will end up, it is incumbent upon us to be a champion for our public libraries – for they offer a service to each of us and to our common good that is perhaps unmatched anywhere else!  As with my first assertion, I will stand firmly by this one!  As I noted in my opening post, all libraries are about possibility, as they contain a diverse wealth of ever-growing knowledge and information, and they provide individuals and communities with access to that knowledge and information, sparking new potential and growth for any and all who may seek it.  And our public libraries are about possibility in the broadest, most democratic sense.  One thing that I have begun to sense this semester is that bridges between public libraries and other library settings may be more common in research and academic/blogospheric reflection about librarianship than it may be in actual practice.  One of the librarians I interviewed for a class “library visits” assignment lamented the increasing lack of connection between public libraries and academic libraries (she being a public librarian in a big ten college town).  And even in the blogosphere, there may some rifts here and there (e.g., a recent rant by Annoyed Librarian about the apparent paucity of non-public and, especially, special libraries in the very public library focused National Library Week celebrations).  But such day-to-day divisions aside, it is still incumbent upon all of us to champion our public libraries, for the ways they contribute to human potential and growth within so many communities throughout our nation and globe.  And I would imagine that even the most non-publicly focused librarian – even if prone to the occasional rant – is yet committed to this essential public service!

#4:  And my closing assumption in that first post?  I receive the most satisfaction from my work when I am able to help people find the resources that they want or need in order to do what they seek to do, be it for the most specific of research or vocational interests, or for the simple joy of pleasure reading.  With that consistent pattern, my natural sense of curiosity, and my dual passions for service and fostering life long learning in others… I have a hunch that I’m gonna love this new endeavor!

Thanks to LIS 6010, so far so good!  J

metablogging!


I must confess, prior to this introductory LIS course I have been something of a skeptic, when it comes to blogging.  I mean, anyone can blog – and that means that there’s a lot of stuff out there on the “dot com” that, well, is potentially just a lot of… stuff.  People really like to put the contents of their heads out there, and why would we want to read most of those contents?  (says my old, skeptical self).  I also confess that I have attempted a blog or two myself over the years, to no avail (which I’ve tried to delete, but some skeleton of at least one of those blogs is still out there, clogging up the intertubes); so, perhaps my own lack of blogging prowess has also contributed to my cynicism?

But now, as I enter into the information profession, I have come to appreciate the blogosphere in ways that I never have before.  For in a profession that is focused on freedom of information, democracy, and the public good, how important is it to have a venue in which any writer can be (virtually) published, and any voice can be heard?  And in which conversation is also possible?  Take that, information industry business interests, corporate media conglomerates, and all you other imperial forces!  The people are speaking!

And speaking, and speaking, and speaking… It’s true, within the essential, foundational framework of freedom of speech/information, there can be lots of words out there to trudge through, in order to find information that is worthy of one’s consideration (whatever it is that one may be considering, at any given time).  Thankfully, there are those that have taken up the mantle of blogging with a professional mindset – and the LIS profession is rich with practitioners who have chosen this medium, as a complement to the professional journals discussed earlier in this blog, as a place for professional considerations and conversations about what matters in the LIS field, for today and tomorrow.

Take, for instance, Lauren’s Library Blog.  Lauren Pressley is an academic librarian, at Virginia Tech.  She is the author of So You Want to Be a Librarian (which has been “unglued,” so anyone can freely access it without Digital Rights Management worries).  It was a classmate’s recommendation of her book that encouraged me to check out her online presence.  As she blogs, Pressley focuses on “reading, thinking and experimenting with the future of libraries, education and instruction.”

Much of her posting is about instruction, and the library’s role in the institution.  These topics represent Pressley’s own professional passions, but they are also clearly among the more central concerns of academic librarianship today, especially in an information environment that has seen rapid changes due to ever advancing technology.  Some of her recent posts have offered downloadable resources for help with assessment, resources for exploring teaching styles (the latter as part of a blog series on teaching strategies), and reflections on the possible future directions of academic libraries.

One post that I’ve found especially helpful was actually a very personal reflection, written in gratitude to the colleagues Pressley recently left, in anticipation of her current post at Virginia Tech.  In her reflections about her time at the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University, Pressley – while of course speaking to her particular experience in a small university library – offers a glimpse into what I imagine may be the broad experience of today’s academic librarianship, in general.  In this post, she emphasizes the support, collaboration and interest in innovation she found at ZSR, towards serving the university community within the framework of the library’s mission; she also highlights the opportunities she was given, to step into and develop her interest and expertise in the areas of information literacy instruction, assessment, new technology for instruction, teaching teachers, and more (Pressley, 2013).

As someone who is more drawn to public librarianship, but with some lingering interest in academic librarianship – and most certainly an interest in how our different library settings connect with and inform each other – I am delighted to read about such broad experience, and the ways in which Pressley was nurtured as a library professional from the ground up, from her days as a para-professional, through her MLIS studies, and to her current work today. I am also inspired to consider the ways different libraries might further embrace the role of instruction as they step into the future.  For instance, how might public libraries deepen and broaden their service to their communities, by focusing on information literacy and instruction in new and innovative ways?

Another blog that I’ve enjoyed exploring is the creatively titled In the Library With the Lead Pipe (which I’ll henceforth refer to as Lead Pipe, just for ease of typing!)  Lead Pipe is equally concerned with the improvement of and innovation in libraries, communities and the library profession.  But Lead Pipe is a blog of a slightly different bent.  First off, it is a team effort.  There are currently seven main authors/editors, along with guest contributors and emeritus authors/editors.  The authors, who are public librarians and academic librarians across the country and even overseas, blog individually, in small groups, and occasionally offer editorials as a board of editors.  And contributions are more like scholarly articles – even peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers.

Lead Pipe offers a wider variety of thoughtful articles and reflections.  Some recent posts of interest include the potential in student advisory boards, for academic libraries; the possibility of future integrated ebook apps, that will make the library e-user experience much easier and more consistent, and will allow for social reading – connecting with fellow readers within the ebook itself; tips on networking, gaining relevant skills and expertise, and fostering professional development for LIS, while working in a non-LIS field; and do-it-yourself (DIY) library culture and the future of academic libraries.

One blog entry/article that especially caught my eye was a January post by Kim Leeder, Director of Library Services at the College of Western Idaho.  Leeder invites us to consider alternative understandings of leadership that do away with the traditional managerial hierarchy and instead foster a more “humanist” approach to work life.  She notes, for example, such alternatives as collective leadership, and a “flipped” model where administrators/executives understand their role as supporting and empowerin frontline staff (“staff having managers,” instead of “managers having staff”).  Leeder also stresses the importance of emotional intelligence (EI) – that is, our own self-awareness, a sensitivity to the emotions of our co-workers, and the ability to work with our emotional selves in constructive ways.  While EI is important in any work landscape, it is absolutely important in today’s libraries, as information technology and modes of communication are themselves changing rapidly, and changing the ways we interact with each other in the workplace (Leeder, 2013).

As someone who is interested in a “human-centered librarianship” (a term which I’ve referenced in earlier posts, coined by library blogger Andy Burkhardt), I am encouraged by such reflection on library leadership.  I would also encourage library leaders to gain competency in additional EI tools, such as family systems theory, which can help leaders navigate the emotional landscape of any work setting –perhaps especially including libraries, where “work families” serve not just individuals but sometimes actual families and other close communities.  For a crash course in systems theory for leaders, here’s a great introductory video, featuring Dr. Jonathan Camp:



Connecting to both of these blogs throughout the course of the semester has encouraged me to explore the LIS blogosphere on a regular basis.  A skeptic no more, I am excited that there are so many mentors out there for the “clicking,” helping me stay abreast of issues, trends, concerns, and creative innovations that are current within the LIS profession!

References
Leeder, K. (2013).  “Someday When I Am Incompetent…”: Reflections on the Peter Principle, Leadership and Emotional Intelligence.  Retrieved from:    http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/someday-when-i-am-incompetent/.

Pressley, L. (2013).  A Chapter Ends, A Chapter Begins.  Retrieved from: http://laurenpressley.com/library/2013/02/.

journaling about journals...


Progressive Librarian

Remember that Lays potato chip commercial with the tag line “You can’t eat just one”?  That’s kind of how I’ve felt as I’ve been exploring one of the titles I’ve chosen for this blog assignment on LIS professional journals – as I delve deeper and deeper into the offerings in Progressive Librarian, I want to eat it all up!

Progressive Librarian focuses on critical consideration of library practices within the context of progressive, democratic, and socially responsible ethics and values.   It is a refereed publication of the Progressive Librarian’s Guild (PLG); anyone may submit articles for publication, but they must be reviewed and selected by the editorial board.  The PLG was formed in 1990 by librarians who were concerned with what they saw as a growing trend toward a library “neutrality” that in effect serves to uphold the status quo – by remaining in silent alliance with business interests, within the information industry – to the detriment of a truly enlightened citizenry that has real, democratic means for intellectual freedom and personal and communal development.   The PLG Statement of Purpose asserts: “A progressive librarianship demands the recognition of the idea that libraries for the people has been one of the principal anchors of an extended free public sphere which makes an independent democratic civil society possible, something which must be defended and extended. This is partisanship, not neutrality” (Progressive Librarians Guild, 1997-2013).   Within that larger framework, the essays in this journal are broad and deep, addressing what it means to be defenders of democracy in different types of libraries; within different aspects of the LIS profession and the LIS academic discipline; and within various local, national and global contexts.

That Progressive Librarian is a peer reviewed journal matters tremendously, in that the editorial board – while standing firm in the PLG’s mission toward a free, public intellectual sphere – seeks to publish articles and reviews that maintain a certain professional standard and that represent the Guild’s progressive professional concerns.  Also in keeping with its mission, Progressive Librarian publishes under a Creative Commons license, which allows for freedom of distribution, given proper attribution, and with a key stipulation that materials are not used for commercial purposes.  The journal editors appear to shy away from editorial commentary, in order to launch right into each issue’s contents, which includes articles, book reviews, occasional PLG reports and essays, and, annually, the LIS student essay that has been chosen for the Braverman Award – in honor of Miriam Ruth Gutman Braverman, founder of the ALA’s Social Responsibilities Round Table.

Some of the topics I’ve been exited to explore, in my brief sweep through Progressive Librarian issues from 2009 through the present, include: academic librarianship that fosters a “counter-hegemony,” in light of an academic culture that may perpetuate dominant ideologies and support the status quo; how library design can support individuals and communities toward greater democracy and even activism; archiving that is for the people, rather than exclusivist – preserving the record of those who are under-represented, and creating easy access to such information for all who would seek it; the role of libraries in acknowledging and addressing white privilege in the U.S; the importance of library services for seniors; and much more.

One of the recent Braverman Essays offers a great example of what lies at the heart of Progressive Librarian.  Sarah Clark (2009) warns that the trend towards marketing in public libraries, which is driven by economic concerns, actually undermines the library’s purpose; in its place, she encourages us to focus instead on advocacy and stewardship: “By reaffirming the library’s unique contributions to society and by stressing its importance in democratic and education terms rather than economic ones, the library not only maintains its historical roots but also stands a stronger chance of surviving as a public institution” (p. 99).  It is this kind of critical attention to social responsibility in librarianship that makes Progressive Librarian one of the journals which I will continue to turn to, as I seek to enter this profession with my feet firmly planted in the library’s public service roots.

School Library Research

The second journal I’ve explored for this blog entry is School Library Research.  I’ve chosen the latter because it is outside my intended area of professional residence, but it represents a library focus that is absolutely essential to our profession, our communities and our society as a whole. 

School Library Research is the scholarly research publication of the American Association of School Librarians (AASL); this title marks a recent change from School Library Media Research.  The AASL traces its origins to 1914, as an ALA section dedicated to the work and support of school librarians, and it became an official division of the ALA in 1951 (Poole, 1976).  The AASL’s mission is “to advocate excellence, facilitate change, and develop leaders in the school library field” (American Association of School Librarians, 2003).  Like Progressive Librarian, this journal is peer-reviewed, which helps to ensure the quality of the scholarship within; authors/researchers are invited to submit original, innovative research regarding all aspects of school librarianship. School Library Research is also an open-access online publication, but unlike Progressive Librarian’s Creative Commons license, permission is required through the ALA’s Rights and Permissions Office for reproduction of this material.  While the journal itself, also like Progressive Librarian, appears to stray away from editor’s comments, choosing instead to highlight scholarship, the AASL has published a related Editor’s Choice – featuring articles selected from several years’ worth of School Library Research volumes, which delve deeper into themes from the AASL’s Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Programs.

In my brief wanderings through several years of School Library Research, I found myself drawn to a great variety of studies, including: the portrayal of disability in graphic novels; cultural competence training in LIS graduate programs; access to LGBT-focused literature for teens, in school libraries; school library service to students with special needs; school librarians’ collaboration with teachers; the role of libraries in the integration of technology in schools; elementary school children’s intrinsic motivation for seeking information; and more.  While School Library Research covers a great variety of topics, and may not have the same explicitly progressive edge as the journal outlined above, the AASL mission focus of advocating excellence and facilitating change indeed seems to shine through quite brightly.  A poignant example is a 2009 article on the importance of multicultural literature – i.e., literature that mirrors the life experience of young people of color – during the transitional reading stage (i.e., from easy readers to chapter books).  Hughes-Hassell and her colleagues find significant disparities in the transitional literature that is available for young people, decrying the white privilege inherent in this disparity, and calling on school librarians “to promote equity in literacy instruction for children of color” (2009).  While school librarianship may not be the place where I will ultimately land professionally, it is good to know that scholarship such as this calls school librarians – and all librarians – to the heart of our shared vocation, on behalf of the people we serve.

Inspiration for Leadership

While Progressive Librarian and School Library Research are but two of the LIS journals available within the LIS field, for this blogger they will be important companions on this professional journey.  The LIS field is committed to democracy, intellectual freedom, service, social responsibility and the public good (to name a few of our core values).  It is inspiring to see how the core values of librarianship are clearly represented in a diversity of ways, in the scholarship that is highlighted in these two publications – and I trust that the same is true for the great variety of LIS publications that remain out there for neophytes like me to explore.  I am glad to have encountered, through these journals, colleagues across the nation (and globe!) who will serve as mentors as I seek to enter the LIS profession on behalf of democracy, intellectual freedom, service, social responsibility and the public good!



References

American Association of School Librarians (2003).  AASL Governing Documents.  Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/aasl/about/governing-docs.

Clark, S. (2009).  “Marketing the Library?  Why Librarians Should Focus on Stewardship and Advocacy.  Progressive Librarian, Issue 33, pp. 93-100.



Pond, P. (1976).  AASL History: 1914-1951.  Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/aasl/about/history-1914.

Progressive Librarians Guild (1997-2013). Statement of Purpose.  Retrieved from: http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/content/purpose.shtml.